I agree with her. In principle. When introducing quotas, or to put through pressure from the media

After criticism on this week talked about business in Handelsbanken has apparently crisis dealt intensively on Industrial's headquarters on Main Street. In brief, made the deal to not have to move at a number of directors wedding veils of the Bank. Crisis management has resulted in a thoughtful article in today's DI - signed Industrivärden's chairman, Sverker Martin-Löf and CEO Anders Nyrén (both also part of Handelsbanken's board)
The main thesis is that "in substance, nothing has happened." The deal is not about retaining some individuals in portfolio companies' boards, there is a misconception. It's about "being able to influence which people should sit in portfolio companies' boards." Apparently a big difference - even though it is just a few individuals which then can be left at Handelsbanken's board table. For example, right - themselves.
When you still get to speak to the point it is just as well to pick up and respond wedding veils to all these obnoxious substances, as they are often criticized wedding veils - as directors' wedding veils fees and diversity on boards. The idea seems to have been: now we seem sympathetic and sympathetic.
READ MORE: The reviewers power, being jeopardized Directors' fees. Handelsbanken wants to "provide members with such market fees that we at the global level can recruit the best," they write. In terms of the Bank's board is the best, according to Sverker Martin-Löf and Anders Nyrén themselves. But the Swedes Pär Boman, Jan Johansson, Fredrik Lundberg, Tommy Bylund and Charlotte Forest. The Finn Ole Johansson. And Jon Fredrik Baksaas and Bente Rathe from Norway. You therefore need substantial fees in order to recruit the best globally - as it happened to find in Sweden, and a pair of neighboring Nordic wedding veils countries. But it's hard for us outsiders to have opinions. Debate The authors only know themselves how international recruitment firms desperately wedding veils tugging at them. Therefore, for example, Anders Nyren have the highest fees among Swedish bank chairman. But they write yet humble that they are "aware wedding veils that this may sting the eyes." Diversity in the boards. One gets the feeling wedding veils that the two rulers had a plan to give in even in terms of their view of diversity on boards. They do the best they can when one nevertheless should make himself friends with the public. But Nyren and Martin-Löf wedding veils limits. It lands in that they are now "understands that diversity in board composition has a great symbolic value." Now they will work actively to have better balance between men and women on its board, which consists of two women.
Feel free to have your say on SvD.se. Our rules are simple: to show respect for the people we write about and other readers who comment articles. wedding veils To get comment on SvD.se you must register an account with Disqus or use an existing account at Facebook, Google, Yahoo or OpenID. Sincerely, Olle Zachrison, director SvD Business Read the rules in their entirety
How so? It is only loosely judgment wedding veils without factual basis. wedding veils SHB was ranked the other year as the world's second most stable bank so something makes its right of way. But yes, it could certainly recruit someone wedding veils from the Asian bank which topped the list.
That symbolic're quotas in a nutshell. If it is quoted in women / immigrants / whatever, how do we know if they really are the right person in the right place or if they are there just because of their gender / color / different? It is likely that there are quoted in people who may not have anything to say really, just to make it look good. A game for the gallery simply. As long as there are 50% women so is the Swedish media content. How it then works in practice is another matter.
Unfortunately, the lack of good leaders, both men and women. But to sit at the head of large enterprises requires not only leadership skills, it also requires extensive experience in running large companies. There is huge shortage of women who have both leadership and extensive experience in running large companies. My work as an entrepreneur has given me insight into many organizations' leadership structure and I do not think we can expect more women on boards if we are to retain expertise. It is not that men are better than women, but to men drilled to a greater extent to the leadership and group thinking from an early age. Should we get more leaders and especially women such as we have to start by getting our children to become smarter and better at working in groups.
Intellectually, we are just one step from the Stone Age. To judge people based on gender and skin color is officially taboo but is nevertheless brought wedding veils every day. Affectation and buzzword saturated rhetoric devastate faith in democracy. A shaky democracy, governed by a wet finger in the air raking path for orderliness.
I agree with her. In principle. When introducing quotas, or to put through pressure from the media to create symbolic value, then opening it for the incompetent, ignorant, and activists.